So it was not uncommon on this project to have a block with an appellation such as this: Waerenga East No 2 B, Waerenga East No 1, Section 7 block 5 Rotoiti Survey District, Maungaroa Kaharoa No 12 block (Amalgamated) Lot C.
...Court’s own motion may:
8.1 Be a lawyer who a Judge considers meets the competency and experience criteria
set out below; and
8.2 Be required to submit an estimate of costs, but are not required to submit a Special
Aid application form.
5 There is no need to prove that civil legal aid has been applied for and has been refused, but applicants
must address why civil legal aid or other funding avenues are not reasonably available or appropriate.
6 Form 53 can be found a...
https://www.m%C4%81orilandcourt.govt.nz
Page 5 For more information visit www.māorilandcourt.govt.nz MLC 04/26 - 12
LIST OF AFFECTED PARTIES
The names and contact details of persons, groups or authorities who you think have an interest that might
be affected by this application.
I te nuinga o te
wā e tuhia ana ki te kirimana, engari e whai
mana tonu ana te oati ā waha.
5
6
te ture, kia kaua e tuku moni nama ki ngā
mema o te kōmiti.
The making of a complaint to the Judicial Conduct Commissioner against a judge
does not of itself serve to disqualify the judge from hearing cases involving the
complainant.
5. If, after considering all relevant circumstances, there is doubt about whether there
may properly be an appearance of bias, it may be prudent for the judge to decline
to sit in that case.
block and a vesting order made at
102 Rotorua MB 332-333 on
5/4/1956 - Application to the Chief
Judge
AP-20230000027565
A20220010829
45/93 Nathan John Bevin CJ 2022/30 - David Te Au and a
succession order made at 41 South
Island MB 9-10 on 24/2/1965 -
Application to the Chief Judge
AP-20230000027567
A20220011703
45/93 Donna Marie Barnes CJ 2022/31 - Norma Margret
Matenga or Norma Margret Barnes
or Tepara Barnes and a succession
order made at 54 Taupo MB 375-376
on 11/4/1979...
The 1865
Act was much more detailed than its 1862
predecessor. Section 5 of the 1865 Act provided
for the establishment of a judicial body having
the status of a Court of record, consisting of ‘one
Judge … who shall be called the Chief Judge’, as
well as ‘other Judges’ who were to hold office
‘during good behaviour’ (i.e. the formula used
for the superior Courts of record).