Search results for "Maungaroa 8 section 1"

Found 1136 items matching "Maungaroa 8 section 1".

291 Taitokerau MB 186 dated 28 May 2025

Kaikohe From: Kaikohe, at Ngawha Innovation & Enterprise Park, 5449A State Highway 12, Kaikohe 0405: 10:00AM, Tuesday, 15 July 2025 To: Kaikohe, at Ngawha Innovation & Enterprise Park, 5449A State Highway 12, Kaikohe 0405: 10:00AM, Tuesday, 29 July 2025 These changes have occurred due to the unavailability of Judge W W Isaac on the dates set out above This direction is issued pursuant to rule 3.8(1)(b) Māori Land Court Rules 2011 and a copy is to be sent to the Kaiwhakaw...

Documents/Panui/291-Taitokerau-MB-186-dated-28-May-2025.pdf (109 kb)

Maori Land Update 2012

1 Māori Land Update – Ngā Āhuatanga o te whenua June 2012 | Pipiri 2012 This update is issued by the Office of the Chief Registrar, Māori Land Court | Te Kooti Whenua Māori as part of the ongoing efforts to help inform and assist owners, organisations and government agencies about the characteristics of Māori Freehold and Māori Customary Land.

Documents/Maori-Land-Data/Maori-Land-Update-2012.pdf (132 kb)

Ngā Kaiwhakawā
Our judges

On 24 November 2021, Judge Reeves was appointed Deputy Chairperson of the Waitangi Tribunal. On 1 May 2023, she stepped into the role of Acting Chairperson.

The Covid Response

04 Jun 2020  |  News

The Right Honourable Dame Helen Winkelmann, Chief Justice of New Zealand, assured the public that courts were an essential service, and that New Zealand courts would continue to uphold the rule of law and to ensure that fair trial rights, the right to natural justice and rights under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act were upheld. 1 Priority was given to proceedings that affected the liberty of the individual or their personal safety and wellbeing, or that resolution was time-critical wh...

MLC 2014 Jun Judges Corner Ambler J

I now turn to consider in detail the five propositions and the various recommendations made in the Panel’s report. Proposition 1: Utilisation of Māori land should be able to be determined by a majority of engaged owners The difficulty with proposition 1 is its underlying premise that there are significant impediments in the Act to the engaged owners utilising their land, and that a remedy is therefore needed.

Documents/Judges-corner-articles/MLC-2014-Jun-Judges-Corner-Ambler-J.pdf (191 kb)