(Land may be vested in a trustee, or shares may be vested
in another person.)
4. An administrative structure similar to a company for managing Māori land vested
in it by the Māori Land Court.
5.
The lease has to be approved by the trustees of a trust, the committee of management
of a Māori Incorporation, or by the owners (where there is no administration structure) in
the same way that they approve a mortgage as set out above.
20.
Whilst information about individual committee of management members is held by the Court, those names and contact information have been withheld
in accordance with the public register privacy principles of the Privacy Act 1993.
Conclusion There are aspects of the current title system that will continue to challenge us, including: (a) The transmission of Māori Land Court orders to LINZ; (b) The state and quality of survey plans; (c) Remedies for blocks with defunct administrative structures; and (d) Owners without contact details.
The beneficiaries are called the beneficial
owners.
11. An administrative structure similar to a company for managing Māori land vested
in it by the Māori Land Court.
12.
Whilst information about individual committee of management members is held by the Court, those names and contact information have been withheld
in accordance with the public register privacy principles of the Privacy Act 1993.
The titles remain separate, but there is only one common
ownership list for all aggregated land (refer to section 308 of Te Ture Whenua
Māori Act 1993).
5. An administrative structure similar to a company for managing Māori land vested
in it by the Māori Land Court.
This tells us that we have many Māori in various governance roles, in various governance structures, performing at various levels. Approximately 42 per cent of Māori land is not under any governance entity.