The Māori Land Court is conducting an inquiry into the entitled successors of the Toitoi SILNA block as part of the Ngāi Tahu Deed of Settlement. To date, the Court has determined the successors of 125 original owners and are now seeking whakapapa information for the remaining owners from around 1895 who have not yet been succeeded to.
If the court fails to fix such a date, the date shall be [5] years after the
date of the court's review.
23
Proxy Form
I, [NAME], being a beneficial owner of the [TRUST NAME] Trust, hereby appoint [PROXY’S
NAME] to vote as my proxy at the general or special meeting of beneficial owners to take place
on [STATE DATE AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE].
Prepare for Court hearing
AP-20230000026907
A20210012782
15/10/2021 CJ 2021/48 - Donald Te Whetu McLeod - and vesting orders made at 57 Waiariki MB 31-33 dated 2 July 2012, 174 Waiariki MB 48-50 dated 2
November 2017 and 205 Waiariki MB 173-174 dated 1 February 2019 - Application to the Chief Judge
45/93 Kim Paea 2.
(continue on a separate sheet of paper if necessary)
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Dated: / /
CONTACT DETAILS
Contact Address: ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................
This schedule does not include applications that have been set down for hearing, are before the Court
for determination, have been determined by the Court and/or are awaiting release of any decision,
determination or order of the Court.
For more information visit www.māorilandcourt.govt.nz
HE TONO MŌ TE TUKU ŌTA
APPLICATION FOR VESTING ORDER
Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993
Section 164
Form 30
Rule 11.13(1)
Office use:
Application: ACCEPTED / REFUSED
Dated: ..............................................................
In Ellis
v R [2020] NZSC 89, submissions were sought on the application of tikanga on the question of whether the Court has
jurisdiction to hear an appeal against conviction after the death of the appellant.