Search results for "Notice of applications in Chief Judge"

Found 1764 items matching "Notice of applications in Chief Judge".

MLC title improvement tereo

Me tāpiri rawa atu he pikitia o te poraka katoa, o te wāhi, o ngā whare kei runga i te 12 Māori Land Court offices Te Taitokerau District registry office 2nd Floor, Manaia house, rathbone Street aX10086, Whangārei 0140 T (09) 983 9940 F (09) 983 9941 E mlctaitokerau@justice.govt.nz Auckland Information Offi ce 135 Kolmar road eX10912, Papatoetoe 2155 T (09) 279 5850 F (09) 279 5852 E mlcpapatoetoe@justice.govt.nz Waikato Maniapoto District registry office Level 2, BnZ centre, 354-358...

Documents/Guides-Templates-Factsheets/MLC-title-improvement-tereo.pdf (349 kb)

MLC Purongo a tau te reo 23-24

Mihi Ngā Kōrero Kupu whakataki 3 Ngā Kaiwhakawā o te Kooti/Judges of the Court 4 Ngā Kaiwhakawā Hou 6 Ngā karakia o Matariki me Puanga 8 Matariki me Puanga Horahora 8 Whakarite mō te anamata – “Hangaia te whare” 9 Ngā kōrero hou mō ngā mahi a te Pae Matua 10 Ngā kōrero raraunga whenua Māori hou 11 Ngā paearu mahi ā-motu 13 Te rautaki mō Te Ao Māori 14 Te Reo Māori ki te Kooti whenua māori 15 Ngā kōrero hou mō ngā mahi a ngā rohe 16 Ngā Whakataunga a ngā Kooti 26 Ngā kauhau me ngā whak...

Documents/Articles/MLC-Purongo-a-tau-te-reo-printer-version.pdf (16 mb)

MLC Pūrongo ā tau2024 25 print2

Te Kooti Whenua Māori/ Te Kooti Pira Māori Pūrongo-A-Tau - Matariki 2024 - 2025 5 Tō Mātou Wawata Kua whakahaeretia ngātahitia Te Kooti Whenua Māori e ngā kaimahi whakahaere nō Te Tāhū o te Ture me ngā āpiha ā-kaiwhakawā, e kōkiri ngātahi ana i ngā mahi kia tutuki ai te wawata kotahi: Kia tū hei Kooti Māori e tāwharau nei i te pae tangata, i te pae whenua, i te whare kōrero Ō Mātou Ratonga Ko tā Te Kooti Whenua Māori he whakarato i ngā ratonga motuhake ki ngā kaipupuri whenua Māori, ki t...

Documents/Articles/MLC-Purongo-a-tau2024-25-print2.pdf (24 mb)

Discussion on Whānau Trusts

01 Feb 2013  |  News

I argued that the information that was put before the Court at that time was incorrect, on the basis that the Judges who heard those applications were not aware that there was an earlier succession application in 1967 where it was clearly intended that all interests were to be vested in one sibling.